In the realm of industrial electronics and automation, certain technologies stand as cornerstones upon which modern process automation systems are based. Among these, the PLC (Programmable Logic Controller) and FPGA (Field-Programmable Gate Array) are seeing widespread use. These systems, while integral to contemporary industrial applications, possess distinct characteristics and functionalities.
It is of great importance for professionals & amateurs alike in the automation business to have a deep functional understanding of these devices & their unique use cases. A clear understanding of the differences between these two can help to inform decision-making and ensure optimized financial investments over time.
This article is dedicated to discovery of the attributes & differences between PLCs and FPGAs. We will aim to describe their unique features, underscoring the pivotal distinctions between each of them. For professionals committed to achieving the zenith of efficiency and precision in industrial automation, or even the hobbyist, this article will help to provide valuable insights for all.
Here we will present a comprehensive exploration of these technological mainstays.
At its core, a PLC, or Programmable Logic Controller, is a specialized digital computer, tailored specifically for controlling industrial processes. Born from the necessity to replace intricate & fault prone relay-logic based machine control systems, PLCs offer a degree of adaptability and efficiency which could not be found in their predecessors.
PLCs are designed to operate under robust industrial conditions, including those where temperatures, vibration, and noise could damage or interrupt other electronics. Their primary function revolves around monitoring inputs from sensors, processing them based on pre-defined logic, and then generating outputs to control machinery or processes. This makes them the linchpin of countless industrial applications from simple machine operations to complex industrial processes & integrated systems.
By design, PLCs possess a rugged nature, enabling them to operate consistently in environments where reliability and durability are non-negotiable traits. Whether it’s managing conveyor belts in production lines or controlling temperature in refining processes, PLCs consistently deliver precision and resilience.
A hallmark of PLCs is their programmable nature, they operate using software suites written in high level programming languages and are easily reconfigured at the software level. Leveraging languages like ladder logic or function block diagrams, technicians and engineers can adapt PLCs to a myriad of tasks. This adaptability ensures that as processes evolve, the PLC can be reprogrammed to meet new demands without necessitating a complete hardware overhaul.
Industrial PLC’s are also modular in design, when additional I/O is needed to expand an existing area of process control a technician can simply add the appropriate card to a PLC rack, expanding its physical capability. This is in contrast to FPGA’s which can be reprogrammed at the hardware level but have a set number of gates & I/O built into the device which typically cannot be expanded upon.
The FPGA, or Field-Programmable Gate Array, is a semiconductor device which contains a number of configurable logic blocks (CLB’s) which are connected physically via programmable interconnection points. Unlike the application-specific integrated circuits (ASICs) that are rigidly designed for a particular use, FPGAs are, as their name implies, field-programmable. This means they can be reconfigured post-manufacture to suit an array of applications. While one-time programmable FPGA’s do exist, the designs which dominate the industry are mostly based on SRAM, making them repeatedly reprogrammable.
A simple way of thinking about the differences between FPGA’s and PLC’s is that FPGA’s are components of systems while a PLC is the system. You may even find an FPGA within a PLC if you look hard enough!
Here we’ll aim to provide a foundational understanding of what an FPGA is, teach you about the different types of FPGAs, describe the advantages and challenges of using FPGAs & give a high-level fundamental overview of how an FPGA is programmed in addition to shedding light on the different types of FPGA programming languages used today.
FPGAs are an intricate assembly of programmable logic blocks and programmable interconnects. Here’s a deeper dive into their composition:
A CLB (Configurable Logic Block) is the fundamental logic unit of the FPGA. Additonally, an FPGA typically contains a combination of flip-flops and lookup tables (LUTs) alongside various types of ports, memory configurations & processing units. Flip-flops provide the ability to store and manipulate data in sequential logic circuits, and LUTs are used to implement combinational logic.
Flip Flop – This is a circuit that maintains it’s state until directed by an external input to change this state. A basic flip-flop can be constructed using four-NAND or four-NOR gates. Click below for a more in depth explanation:
Lookup Table – A Lookup Table, is an actual table expressed in device memory that generates an output based on the inputs provided. Think of an LUT as a small piece of RAM that preloads I/O data based on user programming. Click the link below for further details:
These are the primary elements of FPGAs, facilitating the implementation of combinational as well as sequential logic circuits. Each logic block can be thought of as a small, modifiable “logic machine,” capable of a range of tasks from basic operations to intricate combinational functions.
Serving as the information routes of the FPGA, these interconnects allow logic blocks to be interconnected in a myriad of different ways. This is where the reconfigurability of an FPGA truly shines, allowing for a plethora of custom circuits tailored to specific tasks.
Ensuring the FPGA’s connectivity to the outside world, these blocks can be programmed to perform various functions, from straightforward digital read/write operations to complex analog signal processing functions.
A DSP (Digital Signal Processing Block) is a function specific processing chip designed specifically for specialized functions such as conversion of analog video signals to digital ones and/or execution of mathematical algorithms. A more in depth explanation can be found here:
https://www.analog.com/en/design-center/landing-pages/001/beginners-guide-to-dsp.html
Alongside FPGAs, ASICs and CPLDs (Complex Programmable Logic Devices) are also important components in modern computing that are often compared against each other. Knowing the differences between them – and which one to choose for certain applications – is important for both novice and veteran engineering professionals involved in complex design & computing decisions.
FPGAs and ASICs are both types of integrated circuits with similar internal circuit designs, but they differ in overall purpose and functionality. In general, ASICs are custom designed for a specific application and are not repurposeable. Whereas an FPGA can service numerous purposes and are able to be reprogrammed for different future applications.
Often, an FPGA is used to prototype the design for a new application and once a stable implementation is achieved, the design will be simplified down to an Application Specific Integrated Circuit (ASIC) for scalability purposes.
CPLDs are overall less complex devices than FPGAs and ASICs and are generally used for simpler applications. A CPLD operates using similar physical devices such as AND/OR arrays to do its job but by design they fit into a different niche.
There are three general types of FPGAs, classified by the type of internal memory used: static random-access memory (SRAM)-based, “flash-based”, and anti-fuse.
SRAM (Static Random Access Memory) FPGAs use volatile SRAM to store programamming data, which must be reloaded every time an FPGA powers up. The word volatile is used to describe the loss of bits in memory that occurs when power to the device is lost. Commonly, these are used for prototyping, development, and applications where frequent design changes and tests are needed.
Flash memory FPGAs use non-volatile flash memory cells to store the uploaded programming data, non-volatile meaning that the FPGA memory retains its state until it is erased. This allows the FPGA to retain its configuration and function as expected upon application of power. Flash memory FPGAs are best suited to applications that need instant-on functionality without needing to reload the configuration data after power is cycled.
Anti-fuse, or PROM (Programmable Read Only Memory) FPGAs are non-volatile and remain live on application of power but are only programmable once. This cannot be undone or reconfigured in any way. These traits make anti-fuse FPGAs ideal for applications that require innate security and do not need additional reprogramming, such as in defense, aerospace, or other high-reliability applications
The various applications of FPGAs span across a number of different industry sectors:
Here, they serve as the backbone for signal processing tasks, facilitating faster data transfers and efficient communication protocols. The parallel processing capabilities of these devices are well suited to signal processing tasks and expedient delivery of data.
Modern vehicles leverage FPGAs for everything from advanced driver assistance systems (ADAS) to infotainment systems, ensuring both safety and entertainment for users. A single model of FPGA can be reprogrammed in slightly different ways to accommodate different car models & their associated features.
Given the need for real-time data processing during flights, FPGAs are integral in areas like flight control systems and on-board data analysis. This is another area in which the parallel processing ability of FPGA’s shines. Reliability & minimal latency are necessary requirements in this field.
The speed and efficiency of FPGAs are unmatched in certain tasks:
Unlike traditional processors that function sequentially, FPGAs can process dozens or even hundreds of data streams simultaneously. This parallelism ensures rapid computations, especially beneficial in real-time applications. A typical CPU is optimized toward running only up to a few threads at any given time, and while they generally run at higher clock speeds an FPGA will generally speaking, outperform standard computers in simultaneously computing numerous independent tasks.
Capable of operating at significant clock speeds, FPGAs can handle high-frequency tasks with ease, ensuring data is processed swiftly and efficiently. While not clocked to the same speed as modern CPU’s it is important to remember that these are more specialized devices and the parallel processing ability of FPGA’s is what allows them to excel.
The design and development phase of FPGAs is where their true versatility becomes evident. However, this flexibility requires a rigorous and detailed approach to ensure optimal performance. Here’s a more comprehensive look into the development & programming phase:
The foundation of FPGA design rests upon HDLs such as VHDL and Verilog. Unlike traditional high-level languages used in the operation of a PC, HDL’s are programming languages which describe the internal connections & function of the FPGA hardware itself. So, unlike traditional programming languages that detail the sequence of operations, HDLs describe how components are interconnected and interact. This distinction—designing the actual hardware configuration—necessitates a different mindset and skill set than typical software development.
Originating from a project funded by the U.S. Department of Defense, VHDL (Very High-Speed Integrated Circuit Hardware Description Language) is rich in features and suited for describing both concurrent and sequential logic. VHDL is commonly used to write text models which equate to physical logic gate circuits. VHDL must be approached with a very different mindset in comparison with Verilog, this language does not use a similar syntax to other commonly used programming languages and is very much unique in this regard.
Known for its concise syntax, Verilog is another popular HDL choice. It offers a C-like structure, making it somewhat more intuitive for those with software programming backgrounds.
A detailed breakdown of the two can be found here:
Leveraging specialized software is crucial in FPGA development. Platforms like Xilinx’s Vivado or Altera’s Quartus Prime offer integrated environments that facilitate design, simulation, and synthesis of FPGA configurations. These suites come with debugging tools, resource estimators, and more to streamline the design process.
Before actual deployment, it’s imperative to simulate the FPGA design. Simulation tools allow developers to test their designs under various scenarios, ensuring that the FPGA performs as intended. This step minimizes potential issues and optimizes performance, especially in critical applications.
There are a large number of available software suites with which to perform this task such as ModelSIM, Icarus-Verilog, GTKWave & GHDL to name a few.
Once the design is validated, it undergoes a process called synthesis. Here, the HDL design is converted into a netlist, a detailed map of how the FPGA’s resources (logic blocks, interconnects, etc.) will be used. Essentially, our programming is read and broken down into its functional form & the final expression of the HDL programming is expressed as real world hardware.
This process is well described here:
The synthesized design is then implemented. During this phase, the FPGA’s physical resources are allocated based on the netlist. The ‘Place & Route’ process ensures that logic blocks are appropriately positioned and interconnected to meet timing and performance requirements.
After successful placement and routing, a bitstream file is generated. This file is essentially the binary representation of the FPGA configuration. The bitstream is then loaded onto the FPGA, configuring its logic blocks and interconnections as per the design.
The beauty of FPGAs lies in their reconfigurability. If performance metrics aren’t met or if there’s a change in requirements, designers can revisit the design, optimize it, and reconfigure the FPGA. This iterative process ensures that the FPGA solution is always attuned to current needs.
The intricate and nuanced nature of FPGA design & development underscores the importance of expertise and meticulous attention to detail. Each step, from HDL description to configuration, contributes to the FPGA’s eventual efficiency and efficacy in its intended application.
In juxtaposing PLCs with FPGAs, we uncover the distinct roles each plays in industrial electronics and automation. While PLCs stand as bastions of reliability in direct machinery control, FPGAs offer a canvas of adaptability for a myriad of digital applications. Both are essential, and discerning their appropriate application is a testament to an institution’s expertise in the field—a benchmark that Celtex Automation consistently strives to surpass.
It can be helpful here to first familiarize yourself with terms and concepts such as logic gates, Boolean (true/false logic), and logic circuits in their various types.
Fundamentally, a bitstream includes the description of the hardware logic, routing, and initial values for both registers and on-chip memory (e.g., LUT). It is commonly believed that a bitstream has a vendor-specific format and thus cannot be reversed or understood. This is only partially true.
A bitstream file is more than just the bits in memory required to configure an FPGA, it also has certain human-readable fields to describe those bits. In fact, it has an assembly-like instruction set to describe the FPGA configuration process.
At a high-level, a bitstream file is similar to an executable program. An FPGA Bitstream is a binary file containing the configuration information for the FPGA. The FPGA Bitstream should specify the configurable logic blocks, interconnects, and other necessary components that should work together for the desired function of your digital circuit.
Analogous to the ELF format, a bitstream has its own format to describe the contents. The file format is publicly documented. Thus, you can analyze the contents of a bitstream file, meaning you can access & visually review the steps taken to configure an FPGA within these files. The un-documented part is the bit-mapping: this is the format of the configuration bits, specifically how the bitstream bits map to specific on-chip LUTs, wires etc.
The next step is to learn and use an HDL, such as Verilog or VHDL, to write code for an FPGA design flow that describes the desired behavior of your process logic, including interconnections between components, registers, control signals, and data paths.
The general format for a Verilog circuit description is shown in the code below. Required keywords have been shown in blue, comments in green, and key text strings the user must supply are shown in italics.
3rd, you must debug and verify that your HDL code is correct through simulation and testing. Once verified, use synthesis tools to convert your code into a netlist representation of the logic gates and interconnects.
Next convert the netlist you have created into a format that is compatible with your FPGA device. The configuration files define how the FPGA’s resources should be interconnected based on your HDL code. The software vendor you have chosen will have tools available that provide this functionality.
Load the generated bitstream onto your FPGA device using your vendor programming software. The bitstream will configure the FPGA to implement the logic described in the HDL program.
While PLCs and FPGAs are both central players in the world of industrial automation and electronics, understanding their distinctions is essential for informed decision-making. Here, we illuminate the primary differences that set these technologies apart:
Both PLCs and FPGAs are crucial components in the realm of electronics and automation. However, their primary functions and areas of expertise differ significantly, underscoring their distinct roles in various applications:
At the heart of any industrial process is a slew of sensors—be it temperature sensors, pressure gauges, or proximity detectors. PLCs are designed to seamlessly interface with these sensors, constantly reading and interpreting their signals to make real-time decisions.
Once data is gathered, PLCs employ their pre-defined logic—often programmed by engineers—to make decisions. Whether it’s starting a motor, opening a valve, or halting a conveyor belt, these decisions are crucial for smooth industrial operations.
After processing the logic, PLCs send commands to various actuators or control devices in the field. This could be to control the speed of a motor, adjust the position of a robotic arm, or regulate the flow rate in a pipeline.
In many setups, PLCs also interface with HMIs, providing a visual representation of the ongoing processes and allowing human operators to intervene or adjust parameters as necessary.
Unlike PLCs, which have a fixed architecture tailored for process control, FPGAs come with a sea of customizable logic blocks. These can be programmed to execute a variety of digital tasks, enabling them to be tailor-made for specific applications.
FPGAs find their niche in an array of applications, from digital signal processing in telecommunications to data analysis in high-performance computing setups. Their function isn’t limited to one industry or process but spans across multiple domains.
Thanks to their inherent parallel processing capabilities, FPGAs can handle vast amounts of data simultaneously, making real-time data processing and analysis a breeze. This is especially crucial in scenarios where latency can be detrimental, like in autonomous vehicles or medical imaging devices.
One of the standout features of FPGAs is their ability to be reconfigured post-manufacture. This means that their very hardware, the digital circuits themselves, can be redesigned and adapted as per evolving requirements, something that PLCs, with their fixed architecture, can’t achieve.
While PLCs and FPGAs might sometimes intersect in their application areas, they each have unique strengths tailor-made for specific tasks. Understanding thus is of great importance for professionals & hobbyists alike who wish to navigate the expansive landscape of electronics and process automation.
The primary adaptability of PLCs lies in their software functionality. Engineers can program and reprogram PLCs using ladder logic, function block or in some use cases, high-level programming languages such as structured text. This allows for on the fly adjustments to control process sequences, logic operations, and system responses as industrial processes & user needs evolve over time.
Many modern PLC systems adopt a modular approach to their hardware. If a new component or function needs to be added—like a different sensor or a new communication protocol—a new module can be integrated without overhauling the entire system. More I/O can simply be “plugged in” to the system providing expanded functionality to the user.
PLCs often need to interface with other systems, such as SCADA (Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition) or MES (Manufacturing Execution Systems). One component of their flexibility is evident in their ability to integrate seamlessly with these systems, ensuring that data flow and control commands between systems travel back & forth without issue.
Like any software-driven system, PLCs can benefit from firmware updates. These updates can bring new features, enhance security, or improve system performance to ensure the PLC system remains up to date on the latest functionality.
The fundamental advantage of FPGAs is their ability to reconfigure their hardware circuitry. This means, beyond just software changes, the actual digital pathways and logic blocks can be redesigned to suit changing requirements or to optimize performance.
One of the standout features of FPGAs is their innate ability to handle multiple tasks simultaneously, thanks to their parallel architecture. This adaptability ensures they can manage diverse applications, from image processing to cryptographic computations.
FPGAs can be tailored with custom IP cores. These are specialized blocks of logic designed for specific tasks. If a project requires a unique function or a specialized algorithm, it can be integrated into the FPGA as a custom IP core.
Some advanced FPGAs offer the ability for partial reconfiguration. This means a portion of the FPGA can be reprogrammed while the rest continues to operate normally. This dynamic adaptability allows for system upgrades or modifications without downtime
Understanding the base features of both PLCs and FPGAs illuminates their respective strengths and ideal areas of application. While PLCs pivot around software-centric adaptability tailored for industrial environments, FPGAs shine in their hardware-level reconfigurability, making them ideal for a broad spectrum of custom applications & embedded system use cases.
Historically, PLCs have been programmed using ladder logic, a graphical programming language that resembles electrical relay logic diagrams. This made it easier for electrical engineers and technicians, familiar with traditional relay-based systems, to transition to PLCs. Ladder logic is still widely used, but additional methods of graphical programming such as Function Block & Sequential Function Block have begun to take over in modern times.
Modern PLCs have expanded their programming repertoire. Structured Text (ST) offers a more traditional, high-level programming approach based on lines of code with a defined syntax, while Function Block Diagrams (FBD) provide a visual representation of functions and their interconnections. FBD is a graphical method of programming popular today that allows the user to “drag & drop” pre-coded functions into the user interface which then have the applicable input & output bits assigned by the programmer.
Leading PLC manufacturers provide proprietary IDEs that integrate programming, simulation, and real time testing tools. Examples include Rockwell’s RSLogix and Siemens’ TIA Portal. These software environments are broadly similar but tailored to the unique features and capabilities of their respective PLC brands & hardware components.
Given the critical nature of many industrial processes, PLC IDEs come equipped with robust diagnostic and debugging tools. These tools allow engineers to monitor real-time performance, troubleshoot issues, and optimize system operations.
FPGAs are developed using HDLs like VHDL and Verilog. Unlike traditional programming languages, HDLs focus on defining the behavior and interconnection of the internal digital circuits of an FPGA. A fundamental understanding of digital electronics is required to effectively use these methods of programming.
Verilog and VDHL (VHSIC hardware description language) are the most commonly used FPGA programming languages.
Verilog is a simple, easy-to-learn, text-based language and is widely accepted as an industry standard. It was designed to resemble the C programming language, is more commonly used in the United States and is characterized by a flexible & more forgiving syntax than most traditional programming langauges.
VHDL is known for its strongly typed, precise & strict syntax and is best suited for complex digital systems & signal processing applications. It has a syntax reminiscent of the Ada programming language, is more commonly used in Europe, and is characterized by rigorous logic and prudence on the part of the programmer.
Other less commonly used FPGA programming languages include lucid, C and C++, python, and AI frameworks like TensorFlow and PyTorch.
FPGA development demands sophisticated software platforms. Xilinx’s Vivado, Intel’s Quartus Prime, and other tools provide an integrated approach to design, simulation, synthesis, and implementation. These tools are rich in features, allowing for a deep & granular level of design optimization.
FPGA can be deeply complex and have a wide breadth of application, this requires rigorous simulation & testing on the part of the programmer. Before deployment, designs must be tested under varied scenarios using simulation tools to ensure optimal and error-free performance over time.
Given the customizable nature of FPGAs, effective resource management is crucial. FPGA design tools offer insights into resource utilization, helping developers optimize designs to make the most of available logic blocks, I/Os, and memory elements within the hardware.
The development environment for both PLCs and FPGAs helps to provide a window into their operational differences. While PLCs offer an intuitive, industry-centric environment optimized for control processes, FPGAs demand a more detailed, electronics-centric & hardware based approach which indicates their versatile and customizable nature.
The operational environment in which PLCs and FPGAs are deployed speaks volumes about their durability, resilience, and the industries they predominantly serve. These environments highlight the specific conditions and challenges each of these technologies is designed to tackle:
PLCs are built for the rigors of industrial environments. They are designed to withstand conditions like extreme temperatures, dust, moisture, and vibrations. Many PLCs are encased in robust housings to protect their internals from these environmental stressors.
PLCs are synonymous with real-time process control. They are deployed in scenarios where immediate responses to sensor inputs are of high importance. This might be controlling a high-speed packaging line, regulating a chemical mixing process, or managing an assembly robot among many other cases.
In many industrial settings the stakes are high for the user. Mistakes or malfunctions can lead to equipment damage, financial losses, or even pose safety hazards to employees. PLCs come equipped with safety features and redundancies to ensure reliable and fail-safe operation.
Operational environments for PLCs often require them to communicate with other devices and systems. PLCs are designed to seamlessly integrate with industrial communications networks like Ethernet/IP, Modbus, or Profibus, ensuring smooth data flow and system coordination.
Unlike PLCs, which are predominantly industrial, FPGAs can be found in diverse settings. From data centers powering cloud computing to consumer electronics like smartphones, FPGAs cater to a wide range of industries and applications. Their increased specificity & customizability lends them to a wide variety of use cases outside of traditional industrial environments.
In environments like data centers or research labs, FPGAs play a role in high-performance computing tasks. Their ability to process data in parallel makes them invaluable for tasks like machine learning, data analytics, and algorithm acceleration. While PLC’s read & act on inputs in a sequential fashion, FPGA’s provide greatly increased computing speed in comparison.
Many consumer and commercial electronics feature embedded systems where size, power consumption, and performance are critical. FPGAs, due to their customizable nature, can be optimized for such applications which ensures efficient operation within constrained parameters.
Some FPGAs find homes in specialized environments like aerospace and defense systems, medical imaging devices, or even space exploration equipment. In these scenarios, they might be tailored for radiation resistance, ultra-low latency, or other specific requirements.
While both PLCs and FPGAs are designed to excel in their respective operational environments, understanding these contexts helps in making informed decisions. The ruggedness and reliability of PLCs make them the go-to choice for challenging industrial settings, while the versatility and adaptability of FPGAs allow them to flourish in a plethora of applications across varied industries.
When deciding between PLCs and FPGAs, cost implications and potential scalability are important concerns for the user. While the initial investment cost required might lean towards one, the long-term scalability and adaptability needed by a user might favor the other. Here’s a breakdown of how both PLC’s & FPGA’s fare in these metrics:
For standard industrial applications, PLCs often present a more straightforward cost structure. Given that they come with dedicated hardware and software tailored for specific tasks, initial setup costs can be relatively predictable.
One of the beauties of modern PLC systems is their modular nature. As the process grows or changes, additional modules—be it for new input/output channels, communication protocols, or specific functions—can be added without a complete system overhaul. Very little additional investment or programming is necessary to expand upon the capability of an existing PLC system.
While the hardware might have a clear price tag, PLC software programming environments often come with licensing fees. Depending on the manufacturer and the software’s capabilities, these costs can vary and often recur annually.
In the long run, PLCs might require firmware updates, hardware replacements, or module additions. While these ensure the system remains current, they also represent ongoing costs.
The initial costs for FPGA deployment can be higher, especially if one accounts for the development time, the need for specialized expertise, and potentially more expensive hardware. Custom designs might also entail unique testing and validation phases which often adds significantly to the initial expenditure required.
FPGA design tools, while comprehensive, can also be pricey. Licenses for advanced design suites can represent significant costs. However, some vendors offer scaled-down versions or even open-source alternatives, which can be more cost-effective for smaller projects.
One of the major cost advantages of FPGAs is their ability to be optimized for specific tasks. This can lead to performance efficiencies and, in scenarios like power-sensitive applications, cost savings due to reduced power consumption.
In weighing the cost and scalability of PLCs and FPGAs, it’s essential to look beyond just the initial monetary investment. While PLCs might offer a more predictable upfront cost, the long-term adaptability and performance optimization potential of FPGAs can render them more cost-effective long term in evolving or specialized scenarios.
In an age of rapid technological advancement, processing speed and the ability to perform multiple tasks simultaneously can be critical in certain applications. Both PLCs and FPGAs excel in these domains, but their capabilities manifest differently, shaped by their inherent design philosophies and intended applications.
PLCs at their core are designed for real-time control of industrial processes. They typically follow a cyclic routine: reading inputs, processing logic, and then updating outputs. This deterministic behavior ensures that response times are consistent and predictable.
While modern PLCs have grown in sophistication, their primary method of operation remains sequential. They execute logic rungs or blocks one after the other, ensuring that control sequences are followed in a predictable manner.
PLCs can handle asynchronous events or interrupts, often used for high-priority tasks. If a critical sensor reading comes in or a safety condition is met, the PLC can momentarily pause its current operations to address the interrupt, ensuring timely responses when they matter most.
The deterministic nature of PLCs ensures that the time taken between an input change and the corresponding output response (known as scan time) remains relatively constant. This predictability is of great importance in process environments where timing of outputs is crucial.
A standout feature of FPGAs is their built in ability to process data streams in parallel. Multiple logic blocks within the FPGA can operate simultaneously, allowing for diverse tasks to be executed at the same time. This is a stark contrast to the sequential operation of PLCs and this provides dramatic increases in processing performance.
FPGAs allow developers to implement custom data pipelines which works to enhance processing speed. Data can be processed in stages, with each stage of the pipeline working on different data simultaneously, leading to accelerated computation.
FPGAs excel in applications that demand high-speed signal processing, like digital signal processing (DSP) or image analysis. Their parallel nature ensures that vast amounts of data can be processed quickly.
For tasks that require real-time data crunching or ultra-low latency responses, FPGAs can offer a distinct advantage. Their hardware-level processing eliminates the overhead delays involved in using high level software which often leads to dramatically increased response times.
In summary, while PLCs offer deterministic and timely responses suited for industrial control, FPGAs leverage their parallel processing capability to deliver high-speed computation. A choice between the two hinges on the specific demands of the application in terms of speed, predictability, and concurrent processing requirements.
An understanding of these core differences empowers professionals & amateurs alike to make quality decisions tailored to their specific project requirements. Whether you’re integrating an industrial automation system or developing a high-performance electronic device, recognizing when to harness the strengths of a PLC or an FPGA can be pivotal to the success and efficiency of your endeavor.
When navigating the labyrinth of industrial automation and electronics, choosing between a PLC and FPGA is not just a technical decision but also a strategic one. Both devices are fundamentally different in numerous aspects but each holds a great deal of potential to impact how your systems function. Deployment of one or the other properly hinges on understanding your specific application requirements.
If your primary goal is to manage and control machinery, process lines, or similar applications where robustness, reliability, and real-time response are paramount, a PLC might be the more suitable choice.
For applications centered around rapid data processing, such as image recognition, communications, or any application demanding high-speed parallel processing, FPGAs are likely more appropriate.
Should your system requirements be expected to evolve considerably in the future, the adaptability of an FPGA could provide an advantage, allowing for reconfiguration without hardware replacement.
For industrial systems that might expand with more sensors, actuators, or communication protocols, the modular scalability of PLCs can be beneficial.
FPGA development necessitates a strong foundation in digital electronics and hardware description languages, while PLCs require knowledge of industrial processes and control logic programming.
Consider the availability of training and support for your chosen platform. Established PLC vendors often offer extensive training, while FPGA manufacturers might provide detailed documentation and user communities.
While FPGAs might entail higher initial costs due to development time and expertise, their long-term adaptability can present cost efficiencies. PLCs, though possibly more predictable in initial expenditure, might incur ongoing costs for upgrades and expansions.
Ensure that your chosen solution integrates seamlessly with existing systems, whether it’s communication with other devices, data analytics platforms, or user interfaces.
In scenarios where legacy systems play a significant role, it’s often more straightforward to integrate newer PLC models than to transition to an FPGA-based approach.
What is Industrial Automation? – A Complete Guide
Automation Engineers: The #1 Drivers of Industrial Efficiency
What is the difference between PLC & DCS?
Considering an upgrade of your electrical panel? Our world is rapidly electrifying and your home…
A “short circuit” is what happens when a connection with very low resistance forms between…
Your home can go up in flames faster than you think, as quickly as 3…
Copper & Aluminum Wire Ampacity Charts (Per 2024 Canadian Electrical Code) The following charts reflect…
What Does a GFCI do? GFCI’s Prevent Electrical Shocks The primary role of GFCI outlets…
Connecting aluminum wire to copper, while a simple process, involves safety considerations due to the…